MarketingSEO

GEO Query Finder

Find which ChatGPT search queries mention a given brand. Tests long-tail queries against ChatGPT's web-search-enabled model and reports which ones surface the brand.

OOpenClaudia·Marketing·MIT

Library skill — the default version is maintained in GitHub; edits you make live in your own clone.

Use this skillDownload .zip
How does this work?
  • ChatGPT opens a new chat with the skill loaded. If it's too long for a link, it's copied to your clipboard — just paste.
  • Claude works the same way. To install it permanently, download the .zip and upload it under Claude → Settings → Capabilities → Skills (Pro/Team/Enterprise).
  • Copy prompt copies the skill so you can paste it into any assistant, including Grok.

GEO Query Finder

Find which ChatGPT search queries mention a given brand. Tests long-tail queries against ChatGPT's web-search-enabled model and reports which ones surface the brand.

Trigger

Use when the user asks to "find queries for [brand]", "check GEO visibility", "which queries mention [brand]", "geo query finder", "find AI mentions", or "test ChatGPT queries for [brand]".

Usage

/geo-query-finder <brand_name> [--industry <industry>] [--features <feature1,feature2,...>] [--queries <custom_query1;custom_query2;...>]

Examples: - /geo-query-finder "Acme Corp" — auto-researches the brand and generates queries - /geo-query-finder "Acme Corp" --industry "smart TV OS" --features "white-label,voice-control,OEM licensing" - /geo-query-finder "Acme Corp" --queries "best regulatory AI;eCTD validation tool;pharma compliance software"

How It Works

Step 0: Pull pre-indexed LLM mentions (DataForSEO) — do this FIRST

Before generating speculative queries, check if DataForSEO already has indexed mentions for the brand's domain. If it does, you get ground-truth queries with search volume in one call instead of burning OpenAI dollars guessing.

Auth via DATAFORSEO_LOGIN / DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD environment variables.

AUTH=$(printf '%s' "$DATAFORSEO_LOGIN:$DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD" | base64)
# Google AI Overview citations
curl -s -X POST "https://api.dataforseo.com/v3/ai_optimization/llm_mentions/search/live" \
  -H "Authorization: Basic $AUTH" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[{"target":[{"domain":"<DOMAIN>","search_filter":"include","include_subdomains":true}],"platform":"google","limit":700}]'
# ChatGPT citations (substitute "platform":"chat_gpt")

Critical flags: - "include_subdomains": true — without it, apex domains return 0 results (www.X treated as a different domain). - Omit location_code to get global results; add "location_code": 2840 only to scope to US. - platform options: "google" (AI Overview), "chat_gpt". Perplexity is NOT supported via this dataset.

Extract from each items[]: - question — the real search query where the brand was cited - ai_search_volume — monthly AI search volume (use to prioritize) - sources[] — entries with domain matching the brand have the exact cited URL - location_code, language_code, model_name — for geo/locale breakdown - answer — the LLM answer text (for context)

Decision rule: - If ≥20 queries returned → skip Steps 1–4 entirely; report these as ground-truth mentions and focus Step 5 on gap analysis (sort by volume, find URL-section winners like /guides/ vs /tools/). - If <20 queries → use them as seed input for Step 2 (generate variations of the query themes DataForSEO already confirmed), then run Steps 3–4 only on the gaps. - If 0 queries → the domain has no AI citations; proceed with the original Steps 1–5 (speculative testing) as fallback.

Step 1: Research the Brand

If no --industry or --features provided, use web search to understand: - What the brand does / what industry it's in - Key differentiators vs competitors - Unique features that competitors DON'T have

Step 2: Generate Long-Tail Queries

Generate 15-20 long-tail queries across these categories: 1. Feature-specific (unique capabilities only this brand has) 2. B2B/decision-maker (queries from buyers, not consumers) 3. Problem-solving ("how to X without Y") 4. Comparison/alternative ("alternative to [dominant player]") 5. Use-case specific (niche scenarios where the brand excels)

Avoid generic queries where dominant players will always win.

Step 3: Query ChatGPT via OpenAI Search API

Use OpenAI's gpt-4o-search-preview model with web search enabled:

OPENAI_API_KEY from environment variable
import json, os, urllib.request, ssl

OPENAI_API_KEY = os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"]

data = json.dumps({
    "model": "gpt-4o-search-preview",
    "web_search_options": {"search_context_size": "medium"},
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "<query>"}],
    "max_tokens": 1000
}).encode()

req = urllib.request.Request(
    "https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions",
    data=data,
    headers={
        "Authorization": f"Bearer {OPENAI_API_KEY}",
        "Content-Type": "application/json"
    }
)

resp = urllib.request.urlopen(req, context=ssl.create_default_context(), timeout=45)
result = json.loads(resp.read())
answer = result["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]

Step 4: Check Mentions

For each query, check if the brand name (or known aliases) appears in ChatGPT's response: - Check case-insensitive match - Check variations (with/without spaces, dots, hyphens) - If mentioned, extract the surrounding context (200 chars around the mention) - Note the position (is it #1 recommended? listed among many? mentioned in passing?)

Step 5: Report Results

Output a summary table:

## GEO Query Finder Results: [Brand Name]

### Mentioned (X/N queries)
| Query | Position | Context |
|-------|----------|---------|
| ... | #1 | "Brand is the leading..." |

### Not Mentioned (Y/N queries)
| Query | What ChatGPT Recommended Instead |
|-------|----------------------------------|
| ... | Competitor A, Competitor B |

### Recommendations
- Queries where brand is ALREADY mentioned: create more authoritative content to maintain/improve position
- Queries where brand is NOT mentioned but SHOULD be: these are content gaps — create targeted pages
- Queries to AVOID: too generic, dominated by big players, not worth the effort

Rate Limiting

Notes