Upgrade marketing, content, SEO/AEO/GEO, and revenue skills so changes are judged by platform analytics instead of vibes.
Library skill — the default version is maintained in GitHub; edits you make live in your own clone.
A workflow is not a closed loop until it checks whether the change worked and updates the playbook from that evidence.
For marketing skills, that means pulling analytics after the change window. Manual opinions are useful. Platform truth wins.
Track: - impressions - engagement rate - replies - reposts - bookmarks - profile clicks - follower delta - post length - hook style - proof number - CTA type - topic bucket
Use for: - title/hook formulas - longform structure - CTA patterns - post timing - topic scoring
Track: - impressions - CTR - average view duration - retention curve - watch time - subscribers gained - comments - traffic source - title/thumbnail/hook metadata - video length and topic bucket
Use for: - title formulas - thumbnail rules - first-15-second hook - retention beats - chapter structure - Shorts cutdowns - repurposing guidance
Track: - GSC clicks, impressions, CTR, average position, query/page mix - GA4 sessions, engaged sessions, conversions, assisted leads - Ahrefs rankings, backlinks, traffic estimates, keyword movement - ClickFlow opportunities - AI-search / answer-engine visibility where available - CMS/page change log
Use for: - content refresh patterns - AEO/GEO opportunity scoring - query/page prioritization - internal linking and schema recommendations - rollback decisions
Track: - HubSpot owner, lead, deal, and pipeline movement - Gong call language, objections, buying signals, and outcomes - Instantly/Smartlead positive replies, booked meetings, unsubscribes, spam risk - Metricool/LinkedIn post performance - GA4/HubSpot attribution
Use for: - outbound sequence patches - offer angle scoring - sales follow-up language - content-to-pipeline investment decisions
Every promoted change needs:
Promote when: - the candidate beats baseline on the primary metric, or - the candidate exposes a repeatable audience/customer signal, and - downside metrics are not meaningfully worse.
Do not promote when: - volume is too low - attribution is too dirty - the result is explained by seasonality or unrelated campaigns - the connector failed - only the author liked it
That last one is harsh but spiritually important.
Read-only analytics pulls are fine. External writes still require approval:
# Readback: <skill/change>
## Verdict
Promote / keep testing / rollback / unproven
## Change tested
<what changed>
## Data pulled
| Source | Window | Status |
|---|---|---|
## Baseline vs candidate
| Metric | Baseline | Candidate | Delta | Interpretation |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---|
## Caveats
<confounders and missing data>
## Patch
<what changes in the skill/playbook>
## Next readback
<date + metric>